logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Why do so few patients appeal against detention under section 2 of the mental health act ?

    Article - En anglais

    Objective

    To determine why most patients do not exercise their right of appeal against detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983.

    Design-Part one-retrospective analysis of the clinical notes of patients detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act.

    Part two-interviews with patients on the penultimate day before the deadline for lodging an appeal.

    Setting-In part one, five districts in the Oxfordshire Regional Health Authority.

    In part two, six hospitals from three districts in the region.

    Subjects-In part one all patients detained under section 2 in the five districts in 1993 (n=418).

    In part two interviews with 40 patients detained under section 2 in the six hospitals.

    Results

    Patients were more likely to appeal if they were educated to level standard (odds=2.26 ; P=0.0014) or had had a previous admission (2.19, P=0.0029).

    Patients with a diagnosis of depression (0.31 ; P=0.015) or dementia (0.0003, P=0.0001) were less likely to appeal.

    Compared with those who appealed (n=12) those who did not (n=28) showed less understanding of their rights (P=0.034) and poorer comprehension of sentences from the booklet describing patients'rights (P=0.057).

    The main reasons given for not appealing were not being aware of the appeals process and being deferred by having to appeal in writing.

    After they received a full explanation of their rights 12 of those who did not appeal said that they wished to appeal and four did so within the time remaining before the deadline.

    Mots-clés Pascal : Législation, Internement, Homme, Appel procédure, Psychiatrie

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Legislation, Mentally ill commitment, Human, Procedure call, Psychiatry

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 95-0176021

    Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 09/06/1995.