Objective To evaluate whether an education package will significantly improve General Practitioners'knowledge of the aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of incontinence.
Subjects and methods Of the 5 10 General Practitioners contacted 124 returned a 27 item questionnaire (q1).
The doctors were randomized into a test group (n=80) who received an education package and a control group (n=44) who did not.
Follow-up questionnaires (q2) were sent to those in the test group at 6 weeks and to those in the control group at 4 weeks post-randomization.
The answers to 18 of the 2 7 questions were found in the education package and the remaining nine were not.
The test group was asked to rate the usefulness of the package.
Mots-clés Pascal : Incontinence urinaire, Homme, Formation permanente, Médecin généraliste, Evaluation, Appareil urinaire pathologie, Voie urinaire pathologie, Vessie pathologie, Trouble miction
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Urinary incontinence, Human, Continuing education, General practitioner, Evaluation, Urinary system disease, Urinary tract disease, Bladder disease, Voiding dysfunction
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 94-0540997
Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 199501.