Fluorescein angiography is a common diagnostic procedure.
Questions have been frequently raised as to whether explicit informed consent is needed for this procedure and what form such consent should take.
Review of existing legal concepts indicates that the need for explicit consent varies from state to state, but that the trend is to require an explicit discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives.
Documentation of such information can adequately range from a brief, written notation in the patient's chart to a complete, separate form.
Mots-clés Pascal : Angiographie, Fond oeil, Consentement éclairé, Relation médecin malade, Pratique professionnelle, Médecin, Législation, Information, Homme, Etats Unis, Fluorescéine, Amérique du Nord, Amérique, Radiodiagnostic
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Angiography, Fundus of the eye, Informed consent, Physician patient relation, Professional practice, Physician, Legislation, Information, Human, United States, Fluorescein, North America, America, Radiodiagnosis
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 94-0463093
Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 199406.