To provide activity audit data on 50 consecutive caesarean sections and assess the justification for the decision to perform each caesarean section.
Design A retrospective audit with peer review.
Fifty consecutive women undergoing caesarean section.
The peer review was undertaken by four consultants and four registrars.
The proportions of caesarean sections by indication stratified according to primiparae or multiparae and emergency or elective procedures.
The auditors were asked « do you think caesarean section was reasonable? ».
Mots-clés Pascal : Homme, Césarienne, Accouchement, Indication, Audit
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Human, Cesarean section, Delivery, Indication
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 93-0347066
Code Inist : 002B20G01. Création : 199406.