Emergency contraception (EC) can be used up to 72 h after sex to prevent pregnancy.
Internationally there is wide variation in the availability of EC.
In the USA it has only recently (1997) won approval from the FDA, while the UK and New Zealand have seen calls for over the counter availability.
In recent years surveys, editorials and opinion pieces in medical journals have pointed out that increased access to EC could help to tackle the unwanted pregnancy rate, especially among teenagers, and concluded that lack of knowledge of EC is the major barrier to use.
However, women in a UK study have expressed concerns that it is not safe to use the method repeatedly and cited general practitioners (GPs) as one of the sources of this belief, which contradicts the professional guidelines and the rationale for de-regulation.
A subsequent study sought to seek the views of GPs about prescribing EC and explored reasons for the gap between the views of women using UK family planning services, GPs and professionals at the public policy level.
Data from two studies are presented.
In the first study, 53 women seeking emergency contraception were interviewed at two family planning clinics.
In the second, semi-structured telephone interviews were completed with a random sample of 76 GPs from three English health authorities.
Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted using the constant comparative method. (...)
Mots-clés Pascal : Contraception, Urgence, Hormone, Planning familial, Prévention, Gestation, Evaluation, Homme, Femelle, Article synthèse, Royaume Uni, Europe, Entretien
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Contraception, Emergency, Hormone, Family planning, Prevention, Pregnancy, Evaluation, Human, Female, Review, United Kingdom, Europe, Interview
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 99-0466862
Code Inist : 002B20A01. Création : 22/03/2000.