Mental health service research continues to use only outcome measures that are available rather than develop measures that are important.
This paper argues that it is necessary to select and then define a set of ethical principles that can be operationalized and validated as outcome measures to provide a wider balance of information for health policy and clinical service decisions.
The method used is to adopt a five stage procedure :
(i) to select ethical principles most directly relevant for mental health services and their evaluation at the local level ;
(ii) to propose definitions of these principles ;
(iii) to validate these definitions ;
(iv) to translate the defined principles into operationalized outcome measures ;
and (v) to use these outcome measures in mental health services research, within the context of evidence-based medicine.
We address steps (i) and (ii) of this five-stage procedure.
Nine principles are selected and defined : autonomy, continuity, effectiveness, accessibility, comprehensiveness, equity, accountability, coordination and efficiency.
These principles can together be referred to as the three ACEs.
Of these nine principles, only two (effectiveness and efficiency) have so far been fully translated into quantitative outcome measures, upon which the evidence-based medicine approach depends. (...)
Mots-clés Pascal : Santé mentale, Recherche appliquée, Critère, Ethique, Evaluation, Efficacité traitement, Politique sanitaire, Prise décision, Validation, Europe, Homme
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Mental health, Applied research, Criterion, Ethics, Evaluation, Treatment efficiency, Health policy, Decision making, Validation, Europe, Human
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 99-0398543
Code Inist : 002B18H05A. Création : 22/03/2000.