logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. A retrospective comparison of the morbidity and cost of different reconstructive strategies in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma.

    Article, Communication - En anglais

    Meeting of the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery. Scottdale, AZ, USA, 1997/05/12.

    Purpose 

    Evaluate and compare the morbidity and costs of different reconstructive strategies in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma.

    Study Design 

    Retrospective cross-sectional.

    Patients and Methods 

    One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients treated surgically for oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma between 1990 and 1996 were evaluated.

    Sixty-three patients had segmental mandibulectomies with 30 plate-soft tissue reconstructions and 33 bone-soft tissue flaps.

    Sixty-four patients had soft-tissue-only reconstructions.

    The following outcome parameters were analyzed 

    Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative admission length, ICU and coronary care unit admission length, surgical interventions for complications, re-admissions, and prolonged (>6 mo) gastrostomy tube feeding, and all costs within the disease-free interval.

    Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous parameters.

    Differences among the three groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance.

    For discontinuous parameters, the chi-square test was applied.

    Results 

    Longer operative time (1.8 h) and more blood loss (150 mL) for bone-soft tissue flaps were the only statistically significant findings (P<. 05) between the three groups.

    Conclusion 

    There is no rationale for allowing presumed factors of morbidity or cost select for type of reconstruction in patients with oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma.

    Mots-clés Pascal : Carcinome épidermoïde, Cavité buccale, Oropharynx, Reconstruction, Morbidité, Coût, Complication, Rétrospective, Traitement, Economie, Homme, Etude comparative, Stomatologie, Cavité buccale pathologie, Tumeur maligne, ORL pathologie, Pharynx pathologie, Chirurgie plastique

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Squamous cell carcinoma, Oral cavity, Oropharynx, Reconstruction, Morbidity, Costs, Complication, Retrospective, Treatment, Economy, Human, Comparative study, Stomatology, Oral cavity disease, Malignant tumor, ENT disease, Pharynx disease, Plastic surgery

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 99-0290913

    Code Inist : 002B30A04B. Création : 16/11/1999.