logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Users'guides to the medical literature. XVI. How to use a treatment recommendation.

    Article - En anglais

    Clinicians can often find treatment recommendations in traditional narrative reviews and the discussion sections of original articles and metaanalyses.

    Making a treatment recommendation involves framing a question, identifying management options and outcomes, collecting and summarizing evidence, and applying value judgments or preferences to arrive at an optimal course of action.

    Each step in this process can be conducted systematically (thus protecting against bias) or unsystematically (leaving the process open to bias).

    Clinicians faced with a plethora of recommendations may wish to attend to those that are less likely to be biased.

    Therefore, we propose a hierarchy of rigor of recommendations to guide clinicians when judging the usefulness of particular recommendations.

    Recommendations with the highest rigor consider all relevant options and outcomes, include a comprehensive collection of the methodologically highest quality data with an explicit strategy for summarizing the data (that is, a systematic review), and make an explicit statement of the values or preferences involved in moving from evidence to action.

    High rigor recommendations come from systematically developed, evidence-based practice guidelines or rigorously conducted decision analyses.

    Systematic reviews, which typically do not consider all relevant options and outcomes or make the preferences underlying recommendations explicit, offer intermediate rigor recommendations. (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Canada, Amérique du Nord, Amérique, Homme, Personnel sanitaire, Médecin, Pratique professionnelle, Utilisation information, Recommandation, Protocole thérapeutique, Document publié, Source information, Médecine factuelle

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Canada, North America, America, Human, Health staff, Physician, Professional practice, Information use, Recommendation, Therapeutic protocol, Published document, Information source, Evidence-based medicine

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 99-0289333

    Code Inist : 002B02A07. Création : 16/11/1999.