logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Variations in cardiac transplantation : Comparisons between the United Kingdom and the United States.

    Article - En anglais

    Background 

    International practice variations have been documented in various health care specialties.

    This study compares cardiac transplantation in the UK with practice in the US.

    Methods 

    UK data were from an ongoing multi-center prospective study, the UK Cardiothoracic Transplant Audit.

    The UK population comprised 620 listings and 463 transplants.

    US data were obtained from UNOS and comprised 3946 listings and 4704 transplants.

    Results 

    There was a mean of 14 transplants per center per year in the US compared with 34 in the UK.

    Notable differences in practice include rarity of listing in the UK of patients>65 years (0.2% VS 4.1% in US) and patients with previous transplants (UK 0.9%, US 3.2%). Patients listed in the US were more likely to be on ventricular assist devices (odds ratio 8.0,95% CI 3.0-21.7) or inotropes (odds ratio 4.9,95% CI 3.7-6.4).

    Living donor (domino) transplants, although comprising 7% of transplants in the UK, are virtually non-existent in the US (1 domino in 4704 transplants).

    Heterotopic transplants were more common in the UK (4.4% vs 0.5%). Indications for transplant were similar (except retransplantation).

    The donor age was>35 years in 43% of UK donors vs 33% of US donors.

    Conclusion 

    This study reveals substantial practice differences between the UK and US.

    Further studies are required to examine the reasons for these practice differences, the influence on transplant outcome, and their ethical and economic implications.

    Mots-clés Pascal : Homotransplantation, Coeur, Royaume Uni, Europe, Etats Unis, Amérique du Nord, Amérique, Homme, Etude comparative, Pratique professionnelle, Epidémiologie, Transplantation, Chirurgie

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Homotransplantation, Heart, United Kingdom, Europe, United States, North America, America, Human, Comparative study, Professional practice, Epidemiology, Transplantation, Surgery

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 99-0282896

    Code Inist : 002B25E. Création : 16/11/1999.