Annual Meeting of the American Neurotologic Society. Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 1997/05/11.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of several diagnostic tests used in the evaluation of vertigo.
Cost-effectiveness analysis, using data from retrospective case review.
Charts and test results were reviewed from 192 outpatients seen in an academic tertiary referral center for evaluation of vertigo.
Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using decision analysis software, data from office and hospital charges, and expert-based estimations of the utility of different test outcomes.
Sensitivity analysis was performed using standard algorithms and wide variable ranges.
We found that audiologic testing, posturography, and electronystagmography were the most cost-effective tests, and that magnetic resonance imaging and blood tests had the lowest cost-effectiveness.
The analysis was sensitive to the effects of financial costs of tests but, with a few exceptions, was typically not sensitive to the utility of test outcomes or the distribution of test results.
The use of cost-effectiveness analysis, the estimation of utility of test outcomes, and techniques of sensitivity analysis should help guide the clinician's decision making on appropriate testing for patients with vertigo.
Mots-clés Pascal : Vertige, Diagnostic, Coût, Analyse avantage coût, Rétrospective, Economie, Homme, ORL pathologie, Système nerveux pathologie, Trouble équilibre
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Vertigo, Diagnosis, Costs, Cost benefit analysis, Retrospective, Economy, Human, ENT disease, Nervous system diseases, Equilibrium disorder
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 99-0228450
Code Inist : 002B10D02. Création : 16/11/1999.