Data from general population samples in 11 countries (n=1483 to 9151) were used to assess data quality and test the assumptions underlying the construction and scoring of multi-item scales from the SF-36 Health Survey.
Across all countries, the rate of item-level missing data generally was low, although slightly higher for items printed in the grid format.
In each country, item means generally were clustered as hypothesized within scales.
Correlations between items and hypothesized scales were greater than 0.40 with one exception, supporting item internal consistency.
Items generally correlated significantly higher with their own scale than with competing scales, supporting item discriminant validity.
Scales could be constructed for 93-100% of respondents.
Internal consistency reliability of the eight SF-36 scales was above 0.70 for all scales, with two exceptions.
Floor effects were low for all except the two role functioning scales ; ceiling effects were high for both role functioning scales and also were noteworthy for the Physical Functioning, Bodily Pain, and Social Functioning scales in some countries.
These results support the construction and scoring of the SF-36 translations in these 11 countries using the method of summated ratings.
CLIN EPIDEMIOL 51 ; 11 : 1149-1158,1998. 1998 by Elsevier Science Inc.
Mots-clés Pascal : Qualité vie, Santé, Questionnaire, Echelle évaluation, Indicateur, Qualité, Donnée, Evaluation, Fiabilité, Homme, Etude multicentrique, International, Santé physique
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Quality of life, Health, Questionnaire, Evaluation scale, Indicator, Quality, Data, Evaluation, Reliability, Human, Multicenter study, International
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 99-0058957
Code Inist : 002B30A01A1. Création : 31/05/1999.