The Fort Bragg Evaluation Project (FBEP) showed that children in a well implemented and expensive continuum of care had no better clinical outcomes than those experiencing more traditional and fragmented services.
In an article published in this journal that was critical of the evaluation, Mordock argued that the FBEP results be viewed with skepticism because of what he perceived to be methodological, design, measurement, and analytic failures of this study.
We think it is important to respond to Mordock's critique since it contributes to the great reluctance to seriously consider the study's findings and their implications.
Mots-clés Pascal : Service santé, Santé mentale, Qualité service, Evaluation, Méthodologie, Etats Unis, Amérique du Nord, Amérique, Enfant, Homme, Adolescent, Continuité soins
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Health service, Mental health, Service quality, Evaluation, Methodology, United States, North America, America, Child, Human, Adolescent
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 99-0043627
Code Inist : 002B18H05B. Création : 31/05/1999.