logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Comparison of self, nurse, and physician assessment of residents rotating through an intensive care unit.

    Article - En anglais

    Objective 

    Compare resident evaluations by self, nurses, and attending physicians.

    Design 

    Prospective cohort.

    Setting 

    University intensive care unit.

    Subjects 

    Sixty residents.

    Interventions 

    End-rotational evaluation using a standardized, multiple-choice examination and one of two subjective instruments, Global Rating Scale and Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale.

    Measurements and Main Results 

    Means for overall competence, using both the Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale and the Global Rating Scale clustered between 3 to 4 on a 5-point scale.

    Physicians'evaluations correlated with the multiple-choice test scores (Spearman's rhô 0.3082, p=005, n=82), whereas neither self-evaluation (Spearman's rhô 0.1124, p=65, n=42) nor nurses'evaluations (Spearman's rhô 0.2060, p=069, n=79) had a significant correlation with test scores.

    Spearman's correlations were not significant for either overall competence or specific medical knowledge by any category of evaluator using the Global Rating Scale.

    Spearman's rhô correlations and kappa statistic between the three types of evaluators (physicians, nurses, and self) for each criterion of the Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale demonstrated significant correlations between the ratings of physicians and nurses, except for the assessment of humanistic qualities.

    Pooled clinical skills-history taking (b=0.277, p<. 009), humanistic qualities (b=0.607, p<. 000), and professional attitudes and behavior (b=0.488, p<. (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Formation professionnelle, Etudiant, Réanimation, Soin intensif, Evaluation professionnelle, Infirmier, Médecin, Etude comparative, Echelle évaluation, Enseignement professionnel

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Occupational training, Student, Resuscitation, Intensive care, Professional evaluation, Nurse, Physician, Comparative study, Evaluation scale, Occupational education

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 99-0023053

    Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 31/05/1999.