logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions : Prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet.

    Article, Communication - En anglais

    International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Prague, CZE, 1997/09.

    Context. - Editorial management of articles on health economics may benefit from guidelines for peer review and revision.

    Objective

    - To assess whether publication (in August 1996) of the BMJ guide-lines on peer review of economics submissions made any difference to editorial and peer review processes, quality of submitted manuscripts, and quality of published manuscripts.

    Design and Setting

    - Before-after study conducted in the editorial offices of BMJ and The Lancet of the effect of the BMJ guidelines on review and revision of economics submissions, defined as those making explicit comments about resource allocation and/or costs of interventions.

    Main Outcome Measures

    - Editorial fate and changes in the quality of submissions.

    Results

    - A total of 2982 manuscripts were submitted to the 2 journals during the before periods, 105 (3.5%) of which were economics submissions.

    Of these, 27 (24.3%) were full economics evaluations, and 78 (75.7%) were other economics submissions.

    Overall acceptance rate was 11.6% (12/105).

    During the after period 2077 manuscripts were submitted to the 2 journals, 87 (4.2%) of which were economics submissions.

    Eighteen (20.7%) were full economics evaluations, and 69 (79.3%) were other economics submissions.

    Overall acceptance rate was 6.9% (6/87). (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Article, Médecine, Document publié, Guide, Impact économique, Exploration, Homme, Littérature scientifique, Revue médicale, Editorial

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Article, Medicine, Published document, Guide, Economic impact, Exploration, Human, Scientific literature

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 98-0445310

    Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 25/01/1999.