logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. US and non-US submissions : An analysis of reviewer bias.

    Article, Communication - En anglais

    International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Prague, CZE, 1997/09.

    Context.

    Reviewers increasingly are asked to review manuscripts from outside their own country, but whether they are more likely to recommend acceptance of such manuscripts is not known.

    Objective

    To assess whether US reviewers or non-US reviewers evaluate manuscripts differently, depending on whether the manuscripts are submitted from outside the United States or from the United States.

    Design and Setting

    A retrospective analysis of all original submissions received by Gastroenterology in 1995 and 1996.

    Reviewers ranked manuscripts in 4 decision categories : accept, provisionally accept, reject with resubmission, or reject.

    Main Outcome Measure

    Ranking of papers based on nationality of authors and reviewers.

    Results

    The percentage of non-US manuscripts placed in each decision category by US (n=2355) and non-US reviewers (n=1297) was nearly identical (P=31).

    However, US reviewers recommended acceptance of papers submitted by US authors more often than did non-US reviewers (P=001).

    Non-US reviewers ranked US papers slightly more favorably than non-US papers (P=09), while US reviewers ranked US papers much more favorably (P=001).

    Conclusions

    Reviewers from the United States and outside the United States evaluate non-US papers similarly and evaluate papers submitted by US authors more favorably, with US reviewers having a significant preference for US papers.

    Mots-clés Pascal : Article, Médecine, Analyse, Influence, Nationalité, Critère, Sélection, Etats Unis, Amérique du Nord, Amérique, Homme, Littérature scientifique, Américain

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Article, Medicine, Analysis, Influence, Nationality, Criterion, Selection, United States, North America, America, Human, Scientific literature

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 98-0445260

    Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 25/01/1999.