International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Prague, CZE, 1997/09.
In a previous study, we found that masking success was higher at a journal that masked reviewers to author identity.
We hypothesized that masking policy or other factors could be associated with masking success.
To evaluate differences in success of masking reviewers to author identity at 7 biomedical journals and to identify factors associated with these differences.
- Reviewers at 3 journals with a long-standing policy of masking author identity (Annals of Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society) and 4 journals without a policy of masking author identity (Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA, Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Ophthalmology).
Masking success (percentage of reviewers successfully masked) and reviewer characteristics associated with masking.
There was no significant difference in masking success between journals with a policy of masking (60%) and those without (58%) (P=92).
We found no association between masking success and a policy of masking when adjusted for the reviewer characteristics of age, sex, years of reviewing experience, number of articles published, number of articles reviewed, percentage of time spent in research, editorial experience, or academic rank (odds ratio [OR], 1.3 ; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 0.64-2.8 ; P=43). (...)
Mots-clés Pascal : Article, Médecine, Masquage, Enquête, Réalité, Homme, Littérature scientifique, Identité, Selectionneur
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Article, Medicine, Masking, Survey, Reality, Human, Scientific literature
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 98-0445259
Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 25/01/1999.