logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance.

    Article - En anglais

    Context. - Hospitals and health plans are often ranked on rates of cesarean delivery, under the assumption that lower rates reflect more appropriate, more efficient care.

    However, most rankings do not account for patient factors that affect the likelihood of cesarean delivery.

    Objective

    - To compare hospital cesarean delivery rates before and after adjusting for clinical risk factors that increase the likelihood of cesarean delivery.

    Design

    - Retrospective cohort study.

    Setting

    - Twenty-one hospitals in northeast Ohio.

    Patients

    - A total of 26127 women without prior cesarean deliveries admitted for labor and delivery from January 1993 through June 1995.

    Main Outcome Measures

    - Hospital rankings based on observed and risk-adjusted cesarean delivery rates.

    Results

    - The overall cesarean delivery rate was 15.9% and varied (P<. 001) from 6.3% to 26.5% in individual hospitals.

    Adjusted rates varied from 8.4% to 22.0%. The correlation between unadjusted and adjusted hospital rankings (ie, 1-21) was only modest (R=0.35, P=12).

    Whereas 7 hospitals were classified as outliers (ie, had rates higher or lower [P<. 05] than overall rate) on the basis of both unadjusted and adjusted rates, outlier status changed for 5 hospitals (24%), including 2 that changed from outliers to nonoutliers, 2 that changed from nonout-liers to outliers, and 1 that changed from a high outlier to a low outlier. (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Césarienne, Etude cohorte, Rétrospective, Exploration clinique, Méthodologie, Facteur risque, Evaluation, Femelle, Homme, Etats Unis, Amérique du Nord, Amérique, Chirurgie, Appareil génital femelle pathologie, Organisation santé

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Cesarean section, Cohort study, Retrospective, Clinical investigation, Methodology, Risk factor, Evaluation, Female, Human, United States, North America, America, Surgery, Female genital diseases, Public health organization

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 98-0321207

    Code Inist : 002B25K. Création : 27/11/1998.