Quality of life (QOL) questionnaires contain two different types of items.
Some items, such as assessments of symtoms of disease, may be called causal indicators because the occurrence of these symptoms can cause a change in QOL.
A severe state of even a single symptom may suffice to cause impairment of QOL, although a poor QOL need not necessarily imply that a patient suffers from all the symptoms.
Other items, for example anxiety and depression, can be regarded as effect indicators wich reflect the level of QOL, These indicators usually have a more uniform relationship with QOL, and therefore a patient with poor QOL is likely to have low scores on all effect indicators.
In extreme cases it may seem intuitively obvious which items are causal and which are effect indicators, but often it is less clear.
We propose a model which includes these two types of indicators and show that they behave in markedly different ways.
Formal quantitative methods are developed for distinguishing them.
We also discuss the impact of this distinction upon instrument validation and the design and analysis of summary subscales.
Mots-clés Pascal : Validité, Epidémiologie, Méthode étude, Questionnaire, Méthodologie, Société, Sociologie, Information, Santé, Symptomatologie, Santé mentale, Technique mesure, Qualité vie, Mode de vie, Indicateur, Mesure, Trouble anxieux
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Validity, Epidemiology, Investigation method, Questionnaire, Methodology, Society, Sociology, Information, Health, Symptomatology, Mental health, Measurement technique, Quality of life, Life habit, Indicator, Measurement, Anxiety disorder
Notice produite par :
ORS Auvergne - Observatoire Régional de la Santé d'Auvergne
Code Inist : 002B30A11. Création : 21/07/1998.