Background The aim was to compare the efficacy of intensive clinical case management (ICM) with standard community care in the management of'hard to treat'patients with a severe mental illness.
Method A randomised controlled trial was carried out in East Lambeth, a deprived area of inner London.
Seventy people with psychosis designated as'hard to treat'by referring teams were included ; 35 were randomised to ICM (case load eight patients per worker), and 35 to standard care, which offered follow-up by a community psychiatric nursing service (30 patients per worker).
Outcome measures were admissions and hospital bed utilisation ; contact with services ; symptomatology ; social behaviour ; social functioning ; quality of life ; patients'satisfaction with care at 9 and 18 months.
Results There were no differences in patients'symptoms, social behaviour or social functioning.
Quality of life was significantly improved in patients receiving ICM at 9 months.
Satisfaction with care was significantly greater ambng case-managed patients.
All ICM patients remained in contact with services throughout the study, while six control patients were refusing all contact with services at 18 months.
Conclusions ICM failed to improve the clinical outcome of'hard to treat'patients.
The service was successful in maintaining contact with patients, was greatly appreciated and had a positive effect on their perceived quality of life.
Mots-clés Pascal : Trouble psychiatrique, Traitement communautaire, Psychiatrie communautaire, Efficacité traitement, Coordination, Soin, Royaume Uni, Europe, Santé mentale, Homme, Suivi cas
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Mental disorder, Community treatment, Community psychiatry, Treatment efficiency, Coordination, Care, United Kingdom, Europe, Mental health, Human
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 98-0100532
Code Inist : 002B18I11. Création : 22/06/1998.