logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Evidence of methodologic bias in the derivation of the Science Citation Index impact factor.

    Article, Communication - En anglais

    Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. Denver, CO, USA, 1996.

    Study objective 

    The « impact factor » published in Science Citation Index (SCI) widely used in the scientific community to measure the relative importance of a medical journal.

    In contrast to all other indicators of academic growth in emergency medicine, impact factors for emergency medicine journals have remained low and unchanged since the inception of the specialty.

    We wished to investigate this incongruity.

    Methods 

    We examined the methodology used to derive the SCI's journal impact factor.

    Results 

    The impact factor for journals is defined mathematically as the number of times a journal is cited over a period of time (the numerator) divided by the number of articles published by that journal during the same period (the denominator).

    Citation counts are derived from examination of all references contained in a subset of journals known as « source » journals.

    No emergency medicine journals are included in this group.

    The only source of citations for emergency medicine journals is from journals outside of emergency medicine.

    This produces small numerators with relatively constant denominators, leading to low impact factors.

    Conclusion 

    The apparent failure of emergency medicine journals, as measured by the SCI impact factor, to keep pace with other indicators of academic development of the field is at least in part attributable to a methodologic bias inherent in the derivation of this factor.

    Mots-clés Pascal : Evaluation, Reconnaissance, Document publié, Index citation, Spécialité médicale, Service urgence, Relation, Développement, Biais méthodologique, Etude critique, Homme

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Evaluation, Recognition, Published document, Citation index, Medical specialty, Emergency department, Relation, Development, Methodological bias, Critical study, Human

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 98-0095087

    Code Inist : 002B01. Création : 14/05/1998.