logo BDSP

Base documentaire


  1. The validity of general practitioners'self assessment of knowledge : cross sectional study.

    Article - En anglais

    Objective 

    To determine whether general practitioners can make accurate self assessments of their knowledge in specific areas.

    Design 

    67 general practitioners completed a self assessment of their level of knowledge over a variety of topics using a nine point semantic differential scale.

    An objective assessment of their knowledge was then made by administering true-false tests on two of the topics : thyroid disorders and non-insulin dependent diabetes.

    The study was repeated with another group of 60 general practitioners, using sexually transmitted diseases as the topic.

    Setting 

    General practices in New Zealand.

    Subjects 

    Random sample of 67 general practitioners in Auckland.

    Main outcome measure 

    Test scores for self assessment and for actual knowledge.

    Results 

    Correlations between self assessments and test scores were poor for all three topics studied (r=0.19 for thyroid disorders, 0.21 for non-insulin dpendent diabetes, 0.19 for sexually transmitted diseases).

    Conclusions 

    As general practitioners cannot accurately assess their own level of knowledge on a given topic, professional development programmes that rely on the doctors'self perceptions to assess their needs are likely to be seriously flawed.

    Mots-clés Pascal : Médecin généraliste, Evaluation, Connaissance, Validité, Formation professionnelle, Homme

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : General practitioner, Evaluation, Knowledge, Validity, Occupational training, Human

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 98-0033438

    Code Inist : 002B30A05. Création : 17/04/1998.