A total of 277 third and fourth year medical students and 304 house officers and senior house officers were asked to prioritise the content and methods of clinical teaching.
Response rates were poor, but similar to that in market surveys.
Bedside teaching and medical clerking were considered the most valuable methods of teaching and training in practical procedures such as venepunctures and urinary catheterisation was seen as valuable.
The design of new curricula in medical education will need to accommodate the views of its clients.
Mots-clés Pascal : Enseignement professionnel, Enseignement universitaire, Médecin, Etudiant, Enquête opinion, Evaluation, Méthode, Homme, Royaume Uni, Europe, Personnel sanitaire
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Occupational education, Higher education, Physician, Student, Opinion inquiry, Evaluation, Method, Human, United Kingdom, Europe, Health staff
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 98-0019002
Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 17/04/1998.