logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Data quality in population-based cancer registration : an assessment of the Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Registry.

    Article - En anglais

    Merseyside and Cheshire Cancer Registry (MCCR) data quality was assessed by applying literature-based measures to 27 942 cases diagnosed in 1990 and 1991.

    Registrations after death (n=8535) were also audited (n=917) to estimate death certificate only (DCO) case accuracy and the proportion of registrations notified by death certificate (DC).

    Ascertainment appeared to be high from the registration/mortality ratio for lung [1.01 : 1] and to be low from capture-recapture estimates (59.4%), varying significantly with site from oesophagus [92.2% (95% Cl 88.5-95.9) ] to breast [47.5 (95% Cl 41.8-53.2) ]. The estimated DC-dependent proportion was 20% (5601 out of 27 942) with successful traceback in 3533 out of 5601 (63. 1%) cases.

    DCO flagging (2497 out of 27 942,8.9%) overestimated true DCO cases (2068 out of 27 942,7.4%). The proportion of cases of unknown primary site was low (1.5%), varying significantly with age [0-4.2%, (95% Cl 2.5-5.9) ] and district [0.8% (95% Cl 0.3-1.3) to 2.2% (95% Cl 1.8-2.6) ]. The median diagnosis to registration interval appeared to be good (10 weeks), varying significantly with site (P<0.0001), age (P<0.0001) and district (P<0.0001).

    The proportion with a verified diagnosis was 77.3%, varying significantly with site [lung 55.2% (95% Cl 53.7-56.7) to cervix 96.9% (95% Cl 96.3-97.5) ], age [45.2% (95% Cl 40.9-49.5) to 97.5% (95% Cl 96.4-98.6) ] and district [71.8% (95% Cl 69.9-73.8) to 82.5% (95% Cl 80.7-84.3) ]. (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Tumeur maligne, Homme, Epidémiologie, Registre, Assurance qualité, Contrôle qualité, Indicateur, Recommandation, Evaluation, Royaume Uni, Europe

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Malignant tumor, Human, Epidemiology, Register, Quality assurance, Quality control, Indicator, Recommendation, Evaluation, United Kingdom, Europe

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 97-0441962

    Code Inist : 002B04B. Création : 03/02/1998.