The European Community Directive on Working Time, which should have been implemented in member states of the European Community by November 1996, contains several requirements related to working hours, including the right of employees to refuse to work more than 48 hours a week.
The United Kingdom government attempted to oppose the Directive, arguing that there is no convincing evidence that hours of work should be limited on health and safety grounds.
Much of the research in this area has focused on the problems of shiftworking and previous reviews have therefore tended to emphasise this aspect of working hours.
However, there is much less information about the effects of overtime work, which is a central element of the terms of the Directive.
This paper reviews the current evidence relating to the potential effects on health and performance of extensions to the normal working day.
Several gaps in the literature are identified.
Research to date has been restricted to a limited range of health outcomes-namely, mental health and cardiovascular disorders.
Other potential effects which are normally associated with stress-for example, gastrointestinal disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, and problems associated with depression of the immune system, have received little attention.
Also, there have been few systematic investigations of performance effects, and little consideration of the implications for occupational exposure limits of extensions to the working day. (...)
Mots-clés Pascal : Europe, Législation, Recommandation, Durée travail, Homme, Santé, Performance, Sécurité travail, Trouble psychiatrique, Appareil circulatoire pathologie, Article synthèse
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Europe, Legislation, Recommendation, Work period, Human, Health, Performance, Work safety, Mental disorder, Cardiovascular disease, Review
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 97-0410398
Code Inist : 002B30B02A. Création : 19/12/1997.