In the 1960s, the legacy of discrimination against black persons still existed in all areas of medicine.
This historical analysis investigates the strategies that were used by lawyers alongside physicians, dentists, and patients in elevating health care for black persons.
Primary resources include oral histories, government documents, hospital records, archival and personal manuscripts, and professional and hospital periodicals.
After World War II, leaders in the black community were determined to improve health care for black persons by ending discrimination in hospital policies and practices.
Leaders of professional organizations developed a collaborative strategy that involved the court system, federal legislation, and research and education of the public and health professionals to integrate the hospital system rather than to expand the existing separate-but-equal system.
Efforts culminated in the case of Simkins v Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital ; this case became the landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court and led to the elimination of segregated health care.
Three months after the case, President Johnson ratified the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which included Title VI, thus extending the policy of equality to all federal programs.
Laying a foundation for universal access to health care in the United States depended on a victory in the courts, in national health legislation, and in public opinion. (...)
Mots-clés Pascal : Organisation hospitalière, Historique, Etude cas, Responsabilité civile, Aspect juridique, Relation médecin malade, Discrimination, Race, Homme, Ethique, Politique sanitaire
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Hospital organization, Case history, Case study, Civil responsibility, Legal aspect, Physician patient relation, Discrimination, Race, Human, Ethics, Health policy
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 97-0331165
Code Inist : 002B30A04A. Création : 12/09/1997.