logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

    Article - En anglais

    Background & Aims 

    The relative sensitivities of barium enema and colonoscopy for colorectal cancer are still debated.

    The aim of this study was to determine the relative sensitivity of barium enema and colonoscopy in general clinical practice.

    Methods 

    Medical records of 2193 consecutive colorectal cancer cases identified in 20 central Indiana hospitals were reviewed.

    All procedures performed within 3 years of the diagnosis were identified.

    Results 

    The sensitivity of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (95%) was greater than that for barium enema (82.9%), with an odds ratio of 3.93 for a missed cancer by barium enema compared with colonoscopy.

    The sensitivity of double-contrast barium enema (85.2%) was not different from that of single-contrast (81.8%). Barium enema performed no better in the right than the left colon.

    Cancers detected by colonoscopy were more likely to be Dukes'class A (24.9%) than cancers detected by barium enema (9.8%). Colonoscopy performed by gastroenterologists was more sensitive (97.3%) for cancer than colonoscopy by non-gastroenterologists (87%), with an odds ratio of 5.36 for a missed cancer by a nongastroenterologist compared with a gastroenterologist.

    Conclusions 

    Hospital quality assurance committees and/or third-party payors should review the sensitivity of barium enema and colonoscopy by practitioners in their institutions. (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Carcinome, Côlon, Rectum, Dépistage, Exploration clinique, Colonoscopie, Lavement baryté, Sensibilité, Etude statistique, Homme, Tumeur maligne, Appareil digestif pathologie, Intestin pathologie, Côlon pathologie, Rectum pathologie, Endoscopie, Radiodiagnostic

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Carcinoma, Colon, Rectum, Medical screening, Clinical investigation, Colonoscopy, Barium enema, Sensitivity, Statistical study, Human, Malignant tumor, Digestive diseases, Intestinal disease, Colonic disease, Rectal disease, Endoscopy, Radiodiagnosis

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 97-0195739

    Code Inist : 002B13B01. Création : 21/05/1997.