logo BDSP

Base documentaire


  1. The truth about doctors'handwriting : a prospective study.

    Article - En anglais

    Objective

    To determine whether doctors have worse handwriting than other health professionals.

    Design-Comparison of handwriting samples collected prospectively in a standardised 10 seconds'task.

    Setting-Courses on quality improvement

    Subjects-209 health care professionals attending the courses, including 82 doctors.

    Main outcome measures-Legibility rated on a four-point scale by four raters.

    Results

    The handwriting of doctors was no less legible than that of non-doctors.

    Significantly lower legibility than average was associated with being an executive and being male.

    Overall legibility scores were normally distributed, with median legibility equivalent to a rating between « fair » and « good. » Conclusion-This study fails to support the conventional wisdom that doctors'handwriting is worse than others'Illegible writing is, however, an important cause of waste and hazard in medical care, but efforts to improve the safety and efficiency of written communication must approach the problem systemically-and assume that the problems are in inherent in average human writing-rather than treating doctors as if they were a special subpopulation.

    Mots-clés Pascal : Handwriting Test, Médecin, Etude comparative, Critère qualité, Ecriture, Personnel sanitaire, Evaluation, Homme, Organisation santé

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Handwriting Test, Physician, Comparative study, Quality criterion, Hand writing, Health staff, Evaluation, Human, Public health organization

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 97-0074825

    Code Inist : 002B30A05. Création : 21/05/1997.