Informed consent is a foundational concept of medical ethics.
Since its enunciation almost 4 decades ago, it has engendered, and continues to engender, a great deal of debate and opposition from practicing physicians.
We believe that much of the negative reaction to informed consent stems from some fundamental misunderstandings about what informed consent requires.
This article discusses and refutes several myths about informed consent that have acquired some currency among physicians.
Mots-clés Pascal : Consentement éclairé, Ethique, Mythe, Relation médecin malade, Communication, Justice, Déontologie, Homme
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Informed consent, Ethics, Myth, Physician patient relation, Communication, Justice, Deontology, Human
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 97-0055273
Code Inist : 002B30A09. Création : 21/05/1997.