To assess the outcome of 100 general practice based, multicentre research projects submitted to the ethics committee of the Royal College of General Practitioners by pharmaceutical companies or their agents between 1984 and 1989.
Design-Analysis of consecutive submitted protocols for stated objectives, study design, and outcomes ; detailed review of committee minutes and correspondence in relation to amendment and approval ; assessment of final reports submitted at conclusion of studies.
Subjects-82 finally approved protocols, embracing 34 523 proposed trial subjects and 1195 proposed general practice investigators.
Main outcome measures-Success at enrolling subjects and investigators ; commencement and completion data ; validity of final report's assessment of efficacy, safety, tolerability, and acceptability ; and method of use and dissemination of findings.
18 studies were not approved and 45 had to be amended.
Randomised controlled trials comprised 46 of the original submissions.
Remuneration considerations, inadequate information or consent sheets, pregnancy safety, the need to discontinue existing therapy, and suboptimal scientific content were major reasons for rejecting studies or asking for amendments.
Of the 82 approved studies 8 were not started.
Shortfalls of investigators (of 39%) and trial subjects (of 37%) and an overall 23% withdrawal rate were responsible for a significant incidence of inconclusive results. (...)
Mots-clés Pascal : Essai clinique, Médicament, Evaluation, Objectif, Protocole thérapeutique, Résultat, Acceptation, Réglementation, Homme, Grande Bretagne, Royaume Uni, Europe, Pharmacologie, Ethique
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Clinical trial, Drug, Evaluation, Objective, Therapeutic protocol, Result, Acceptance, Regulation, Human, Great Britain, United Kingdom, Europe, Pharmacology, Ethics
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 97-0033908
Code Inist : 002B02A06. Création : 21/05/1997.