logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Group peer review : a questionnaire-based survey.

    Article - En anglais

    Objective 

    This paper presents the findings from a questionnaire-based survey of psychiatrists designed to elucidate the positive and negative aspects of group peer review and its perceived place in accountability procedures, and to provide information about how accountability through group peer review might be improved.

    Method 

    Three hundred and eighty-eight psychiatrists were surveyed via mail-out questionnaire.

    Demographic data, details of groups, and perceptions of beneficial and detrimental effects of group peer review were sought from group participants and non-participants.

    Attitudes of participants were compared with those of non-participants.

    Features of groups related to satisfaction in participants were examined.

    Results 

    The majority of the 170 respondents participating in groups regarded peer review as a means of maintaining and improving skills, sharing ideas and methods, receiving constructive criticism and feedback, of educational benefit and an important source of professional accountability.

    Non-participants, while less positive overall, responded equally that participation in peer review groups would be an effective response to accountability procedures.

    Potential detrimental effects and problems with the functioning of peer review groups were elucidated.

    Conclusions 

    Group peer review contributes significantly to professional accountability and education in well-functioning groups. (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Psychiatre, Formation permanente, Relation interpair, Motivation, Participation, Personnel sanitaire, Australie, Océanie, Homme, Groupe travail

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Psychiatrist, Continuing education, Peer relation, Motivation, Participation, Health staff, Australia, Oceania, Human

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 96-0504499

    Code Inist : 002B18H04. Création : 10/04/1997.