- This article, the third in a 3-part series, describes recommendations for the reporting of cost-effective analyses (CEAs) intended to improve the quality and accessibility of CEA reports.
- The Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, a nonfederal panel with expertise in CEA, clinical medicine, ethics, and health outcomes measurement, convened by the US Public Health Service.
Evidence. - The panel reviewed the theoretical foundations of CEA, current practices, alternative methods, published critiques of CEAs, and criticisms of general CEA methods and reporting practices.
Consensus Process. - The panel developed recommendations through 2 1/2 years of discussions.
Comments on preliminary drafts were solicited from federal govemment methodologists, health agency officials, and academic methodologists.
- These recommendations are proposed to enhance the transparency of study methods, assist analysts in providing complete information, and facilitate the presentation of comparable cost-effectiveness results across studies.
Adherence to reporting conventions and attention to providing information required to understand and interpret study results will improve the relevance and accessibility of CEAs.
Mots-clés Pascal : Analyse coût efficacité, Recommandation, Evaluation, Qualité, Homme, Epidémiologie, Méthodologie, Economie santé
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Cost efficiency analysis, Recommendation, Evaluation, Quality, Human, Epidemiology, Methodology, Health economy
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 96-0502191
Code Inist : 002B30A01A1. Création : 10/04/1997.