To evaluate empirically the implications of choosing different thresholds to classify conduct disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder for estimating prevalence, test-retest reliability of measurement, and informant (parent/teacher) agreement and for evaluating comorbidity and associated features of disorder.
Data for the study came from problem checklist assessments done by parents and teachers of children aged 6 to 16 years (N=1,229) selected with known probability from a general population sample and from structured interviews obtained in a stratified, random subsample (n=251).
Estimates varied widely depending on the rationale used to set thresholds.
Percent prevalence went from 0.1 to 39.2 ; kappa estimates of test-retest reliability went from. 19 to. 82.
Parent-teacher agreement based on kappa went from. 0 to. 38.
Relative odds between disorder and associated features varied twofold.
Use of different rationales to set thresholds for classifying childhood psychiatric disorder in the general population has profound implications for what we learn about the epidemiology of childhood disorder.
Mots-clés Pascal : Classification, Trouble psychiatrique, Trouble attention, Hyperactivité, Trouble comportement social, Association morbide, Epidémiologie, Enquête, Enfant, Homme, Préadolescent, Adolescent, Trouble conduite
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Classification, Mental disorder, Attentional disorder, Hyperactivity, Social behavior disorder, Concomitant disease, Epidemiology, Inquiry, Child, Human, Preadolescent, Adolescent, Conduct disorder
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 96-0493828
Code Inist : 002B18B02. Création : 10/04/1997.