logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Economic evaluations in the critical care literature : Do they help us improve the efficiency of our unit ?

    Article - En anglais

    Objective 

    To determine the extent to which economic evaluations published in the critical care literature provide information that can help us to improve the efficiency of our unit.

    Data Sources 

    We searched computerized bibliographic databases and manually searched key critical care journals to retrieve all economic evaluations.

    Study Selection 

    We included economic evaluations that dealt with clinical problems relevant to the practice of adult critical care and that compared competing healthcare interventions.

    Data Abstraction 

    Included articles were further evaluated using criteria for minimal methodologic soundness, adopted from the literature, and criteria that we developed to assess the generalizability of results to our clinical setting.

    Data Synthesis 

    We screened 4,167 papers manually and>450 abstracts and titles in our computer search.

    One hundred fifty-one papers were retrieved for further evaluation ; 29 papers met our inclusion criteria.

    Of these 29 papers, only 14 (48%) adequately described competing healthcare interventions, 17 (59%) provided sufficient evidence of clinical efficacy, six (21%) identified, measured, and valuated costs appropriately, and three (10%) performed a sensitivity analysis.

    None of the papers met all four of these criteria for a minimum level of methodologic soundness.

    Four (14%) of 29 studies which adequately dealt with issues of cost and efficacy were evaluated using our generalizability criteria. (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Economie santé, Document publié, Soin intensif, Littérature scientifique, Efficacité traitement, Amélioration, Analyse avantage coût, Analyse coût efficacité

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Health economy, Published document, Intensive care, Scientific literature, Treatment efficiency, Improvement, Cost benefit analysis, Cost efficiency analysis

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 96-0458670

    Code Inist : 002B27B15. Création : 10/04/1997.