logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care : A comparison of indices.

    Article - En anglais

    Objectives

    In spite of the widespread use of prenatal care utilization indices in the scientific literature, little attention has been given to the extent to which these indices are comparable.

    This investigation contrasts the way five indices classified cases into categories of prenatal care use.

    Methods

    From the 1989-1991 South Carolina Public Use data files, single live births to resident mothers were selected for analysis (N=169,082).

    Five prenatal care indices were compared : (a) the modified Institute of Medicine (Kessner) index, (b) a variation of the IOM index using the full American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology visit recommendation, (c) an index derived from the recommendations of the U.S. Public Health Service Expert Panel on Prenatal Care, (d) the GINDEX, and (e) the APNCU index.

    Results

    The proportion of cases assigned to prenatal care utilization categories by each index varied markedly, ranging from 33.6% to 58.1% for adequate care, 9.2% to 20.3% for inadequate care, and 7.4% to 22.6% for intensive utilization.

    Conclusions

    The selection of a prenatal care utilization index for research and policy development purposes requires a careful consideration ofthe intent, criteria for defining adequacy, and coding assumptions of each index.

    As these indices are conceptually distinct in their measurement approach, they are likely to yield different patterns of prenatal care use in a population and cannot be used interchangeably. (...)

    Mots-clés Pascal : Soin, Prénatal, Utilisation, Service santé, Indicateur, Etude comparative, Système santé, Caroline du Sud, Etats Unis, Amérique du Nord, Amérique, Evaluation

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Care, Prenatal, Use, Health service, Indicator, Comparative study, Health system, South Carolina, United States, North America, America, Evaluation

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 96-0439511

    Code Inist : 002B30A01B. Création : 10/04/1997.