logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department : process, outcome, and comparative cost.

    Article - En anglais

    Objective

    To see whether care provided by general practitioners to non-emergency patients in an accident and emergency department differs significantly from care by usual accident and emergency staff in terms of process, outcome, and comparative cost.

    Design-A randomised controlled trial

    Setting-A busy inner city hospital's accident and emergency department which employed three local general practitioners on a sessional basis.

    Patients-All new attenders categorised by the triage system as « semiurgent » or « delay acceptable. » 66% of all attenders were eligible for inclusion.

    Main outcome measures-Numbers of patients undergoing investigation, referral, or prescription ; types of disposal ; consultation satisfaction scores ; reattendance to accident and emergency department within 30 days of index visit ; health status at one month ; comparative cost differences.

    Results

    4684 patients participated.

    For semiurgent patients, by comparison with usual accident and emergency staff, general practitioners investigated fewer patients (relative difference 20% ; 95% confidence interval 16% to 25%), referred to other hospital services less often (39% ; 28% to 47%), admitted fewer patients (45% ; 32% to 56%), and prescribed more often (41% ; 30% to 54%). A similar trend was found for patients categorised as delay acceptable and (in a separate analysis) by presenting complaint category. 393 (17%) patients who had been seen by general practitioner staff reattended the depa...

    Mots-clés Pascal : Médecin généraliste, Soin, Urgence, Service hospitalier, Coût, Economie santé, Homme, Etude comparative, Ville

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : General practitioner, Care, Emergency, Hospital ward, Costs, Health economy, Human, Comparative study, Town

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 96-0271525

    Code Inist : 002B30A04B. Création : 199608.