logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. The importance of quality of primary studies in producing unbiased systematic reviews.

    Article - En anglais

    Background 

    Traditional and largely qualitative reviews of evidence are now giving way to much more structured systematic overviews that use a quantitative method to calculate the overall effect of treatment.

    The latter approach is dependent on the quality of primary studies, which may introduce bias if they are of poor methodologic quality.

    Objective 

    To test the hypothesis that the inclusion of poor-quality trials in meta-analyses would bias the conclusions and produce incorrect estimates of treatment effect.

    Methods 

    An overview of randomized trials of antiestrogen therapy in subfertile men with oligospermia was performed to test the hypothesis.

    Data sources included online searching of MEDLINE and Science Citation Index databases between 1966 and 1994, scanning the bibliography of known primary studies and review articles, and contacting experts in the field.

    After independent, blind assessment, nine of 149 originally identified studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected.

    We assessed study quality independently

    Outcome data from each study were pooled and statistically summarized.

    Results 

    There was a marginal improvement in pregnancy rate with antiestrogen treatment (odds ratio, 1.6 ; 95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 2.6).

    Sensitivity analyses on the basis of methodologic quality demonstrated that poor-quality studies produced a positive effect with treatment, whereas no benefit was observed with high-quality studies.

    Conclusions 

    The r...

    Mots-clés Pascal : Essai thérapeutique contrôlé, Médecine, Métaanalyse, Biais méthodologique, Antioestrogène, Chimiothérapie, Oligospermie, Traitement, Homme, Mâle, Appareil génital mâle pathologie, Sperme pathologie

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Controlled therapeutic trial, Medicine, Metaanalysis, Methodological bias, Antiestrogen, Chemotherapy, Oligospermia, Treatment, Human, Male, Male genital diseases, Semen disorders

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 96-0185972

    Code Inist : 002B30A01A1. Création : 199608.