General practitioners (GPs) in the United Kingdom are central to the commissioning of health care services.
A qualitative study of their views was therefore designed, which incorporated an in-depth (open) interview technique carried out on a 20% sample of all GPs (n=100) in one United Kingdom Health District.
The data from these interviews indicated that GPs were aware of, but had mixed feelings about the need for rationing.
They expressed disquiet about the dilemma faced in rationing health care at the time of the consultation and readily associated issues of cost in their practice with rationing.
Some of the currently adopted methods of rationing (waiting lists, co-payments and ability to pay) were commented upon.
The respondents also made suggestions on how rationing could be carried out, which included :
maximizing efficiency to reduce the need for rationing ;
using a third party committee to make rationing decisions, with a membership of clinicians, managers, and possibly public representatives, and ;
being explicit about how rationing is done.
Fundholding brought rationing decisions to the fore, and worried most who discussed it in the context of rationing.
The conclusion of this paper is that current implicit rationing policies in the National Health Service are flawed as they assume that GPs will ration health care at the time of the consultation.
The involvement of GPs in the rationing process is important (particularly given the present expansion...
Mots-clés Pascal : Médecin généraliste, Personnel sanitaire, Homme, Royaume Uni, Enquête, Perception sociale, Attitude, Rationnement, Soin, Contrôle coût, Système santé, Economie santé, Europe
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : General practitioner, Health staff, Human, United Kingdom, Inquiry, Social perception, Attitude, Rationing, Care, Cost control, Health system, Health economy, Europe
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 96-0181380
Code Inist : 002B30A01B. Création : 199608.