logo BDSP

Base documentaire


Votre avis nous intéresse

Le réseau BDSP met en oeuvre un projet d'innovation et d'amélioration de ses services, dans le souci constant de proposer des contenus de qualité adaptés aux besoins des utilisateurs.

Identifier de nouvelles sources de financements est la condition nécessaire pour assurer la poursuite et la pérennité de cet outil unique qu'est la BDSP, tout en le faisant évoluer.

Pour définir un nouveau modèle économique, nous avons besoin de votre avis : merci de répondre à notre enquête (temps estimé : 5 minutes).

Participer maintenant
Participer plus tard J'ai déjà participé

  1. Complete blood count specimen acceptability : a college of American pathologists Q-probes study of 703 laboratories.

    Article - En anglais

    Objective

    - to determine the frequency and reasons for rejection of specimens submitted to the laboratory for complete blood count studies.

    Design and Setting

    - College of American Pathologists'Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement study prospective recording of rejected complete blood count specimens and associated factors in 703 laboratories.

    Main Outcome Measure

    - Percentage of submitted specimens rejected for testing.

    Results

    - Of 7 894 882 complete blood count specimens submitted for testing to the participating laboratories during the data collection period, 35347 were rejected.

    The most frequent reason for rejection was a clotted specimen, which occurred about six times more frequently than the second most cited reason, insufficient specimen quantity.

    Compared with their respective frequency of use for specimen collection, significantly more rejected specimens were collected in microtubes than in other containers.

    Compared with the respective frequency with which they collect specimens, laboratory personnel had fewer rejected specimens than the other personnel groups.

    The poorest performance was exhibited by other in-hospital nonlaboratory personnel.

    Hospital bedsize was also a significant performance factor.

    Conclusions

    - Specimen rejection should be monitored on a regular basis, identifying institution-specific factors that are associated with rejection.

    Monitoring of sufficient significant variables will help narrow the focus of corrective action.

    Mots-clés Pascal : Hémogramme, Rejet, Prélèvement, Cause, Assurance qualité, Défaut, Echantillon, Etude multicentrique, Biologie clinique

    Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Blood cell count, Rejection, Samplings, Cause, Quality assurance, Defect, Sample, Multicenter study, Clinical biology

    Logo du centre Notice produite par :
    Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique

    Cote : 95-0502808

    Code Inist : 002B30A04D. Création : 01/03/1996.