Review criteria are designed to enable clinicians and others to assess care.
However, there is no established method for developing criteria, and they are often confused with guidelines.
Criteria should comprise measurable activities that are appropriate for the setting in which they are to be used.
They should also be based on research evidence and prioritised according to the strength of that evidence and effect on outcome.
Good criteria can be used to aid implementation of guidelines by providing a standard against which to monitor performance and enabling clinical audit.
Mots-clés Pascal : Traitement, Homme, Critère qualité, Soin
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Treatment, Human, Quality criterion, Care
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 95-0457927
Code Inist : 002B30A01A2. Création : 01/03/1996.