The medical literature was evaluated with respect to the efficacy of NSAIDs for shoulder complaints.
Nineteen randomized clinical trials met the selection criteria and were included in this review.
Each publication was independently scored by two blinded reviewers, according to a standardized set of 17 methodological criteria.
The studies were ranked according to their total methods score (maximum 100 points).
The methodological quality of the majority of the studies was rather disappointing ; only 5 trials received a methods score exceeding 50 points.
Furthermore, methodological criteria were often inadequately described, particularly those regarding the randomization procedure, co-interventions and control of compliance.
The three trials with the highest methods scores demonstrated superior short-term efficacy of NSAIDs in comparison with placebo intervention.
Fourteen trials comparing two types of NSAIDs showed no conclusive evidence in favour of a particular NSAID with respect to efficacy or tolerability.
Future studies should compare the benefit-risk ratios of NSAIDs and analgesics for shoulder complaints in order to establish whether the use of NSAIDs is more favourable than analgesics, despite the higher risk of adverse reactions from NSAIDs.
Mots-clés Pascal : Antiinflammatoire non stéroïde, Chimiothérapie, Efficacité traitement, Douleur, Epaule, Membre supérieur, Article synthèse, Méthodologie, Essai clinique, Randomisation, Homme, Système ostéoarticulaire pathologie
Mots-clés Pascal anglais : Non steroidal antiinflammatory agent, Chemotherapy, Treatment efficiency, Pain, Shoulder, Upper limb, Review, Methodology, Clinical trial, Randomization, Human, Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Notice produite par :
Inist-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique
Cote : 95-0260897
Code Inist : 002B02L. Création : 01/03/1996.